Blended learning is
more effective than traditional learning

There was a time when going to school meant only sitting at a
desk and listening to the teachers talk while they used chalk and a blackboard
to explain something to their students. Homework had to be done and written
down in a notebook, the one made of paper. The students had to be in the
classroom every single day. And this ritual would repeat itself throughout the
year. As the decades passed by, a considerable part of this scenery has
changed. In some schools, the blackboard is not black anymore; it´s either
white or glass, and the teachers don’t have to use chalk anymore; they can use
markers. Teachers now have to deal with technology such as stereos, projectors,
computers, ipads and all the gadgets that come along with them. Some students,
instead of paper notebooks, bring computers to class to take notes on important
things. But a real sign that times have changed is that students don’t even
have to be in the classroom to study
anymore. They can come to class every other week and, when they´re not at
school, access the internet in order to do the activities related to their
courses. This whole new scenery leads us to an inevitable question. Is blended
learning more effective than traditional learning? No, traditional learning is
still the best alternative to good education.
The defenders of blended learning state that it has
innumerable advantages, such as saving money and time, and that the use of technology
functions as a student´s ally. You could save money, for example, not having to
commute from your house to school every day, which would also generate savings
for the school, because it wouldn’t have to spend money on electricity, water
and paper. You could save time because you would have more control over when
exactly you would access the course online and how much time you would spend in
each activity.
All these arguments have to be taken into account. However, they´re
weak comparing to the advantages that traditional education offers. Traditional
learning provides the student with teacher–student time, which is fundamental
for a solid education. Life experience and knowledge exchange between teachers
and students can´t be given by an online course. It is also known that an
effective education is based on the individualization of the instruction. The
teacher has to be familiar with his/her students and aware of each one´s needs;
know their faces and names well. Also, the sense of accountability is a very
important aspect that appears in traditional education. Things work better if
you have a teacher asking you what to do each class than if you have only a vague
deadline on the internet. Traditional education, therefore, has features that
can´t be replaced by blended education.
Besides, being at school also makes the students focus on
their activities. Although they might get distracted sometimes while at school,
they are still in a study environment, where everything leads to learning. There
are specified times to study and breaks, to relax for a while. Being at home,
on the other hand, brings many distractions. In addition, being at school
brings the student a sense of community, because it shows the individual how to
live in society, which he/she won´t acquire studying alone, at home. Learning
how to live in society is vital.
Furthermore, technology is essential nowadays, while it may
also be a great source of distraction for the students, especially for the
younger ones. Let´s take a student who needs to do research on the internet,
for instance. He/she might get distracted by opening tons of pages that have
absolutely nothing to do with the subject of interest, while looking for the
necessary material; not to mention social webs, games and music.
In summary, traditional education still represents the best
path to quality education. Teachers have to feel whether the subject that
they´re teaching is reaching their students or not and how it is affecting
their lives. There isn´t a better way to do that than actually being in the classroom, sharing
experiences with the students. The teacher´s figure and presence are strong, invaluable
assets for the students, and should never be replaced by computers.